Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 9101 - 9120 of 11,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
At the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog, Douglas Berman observes that “about a quarter of the cases still on th[is term’s merits] docket involve criminal justice matters. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 2:19 am
#146 The Invent Blog#147 Rush on Business#148 Blawg IT#149 Antitrust Review#150 Trust Matters#151 Lex Ferenda#152 TechnoLawyer Blog#153 Declarations & Exclusions#154 HealthBlawg#155 California Blog of Appeal#156 Virtually Blind#157 Labour Law Blog#158 The Mommy Blawg#159 Whistleblower Law Blog#160 Ruthie's Law#161 Patent Baristas#162 China Law Blog#163 More Partner Income#164 cearta.ie#165 French-Law.net#166 GeekLawyer#167 E-Commerce Law#168 W.VA Business Litigation#169… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:12 pm by Amy Howe
  Moreover, the school board noted, three current members of the Court – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas – have recently “expressed increasing interest” in the question whether the Court should reconsider the doctrine of Auer deference. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:20 am by Jason Rantanen
The Court was split five to four with Justices Kennedy writing for Justices Roberts, Thomas, Scalia, and Alito. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
The government is on a bit firmer footing with what Kerr would call the “policy model”:  the determination of whether the expecation of privacy is reasonable depends upon whether it is desirable to have that outcome as a matter of policy. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm by Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery
(Our colleague responded that what matters is the principle, not the technology available at any one time). [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am by Eric Rassbach
Moreover, just last term, Justice Clarence Thomas reiterated, in his concurring opinion in American Legion v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:29 pm by Al Saikali
For example, it may not matter very much that your company has adopted the most state-of-the-art, expensive, top-flight security measures if a service provider is not taking equally strong measures to protect the same data. [read post]
5 Apr 2006, 8:40 am
As a matter of law, an act hat violates established norms of warfare and armed conflict under international law is not an act occurring in the course of armed conflict. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:08 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Garnett, 2012 NSSC 132 Building contract – consultants – enforcement – third parties Thomas G. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court’s nine members seem likely to disapprove of the endorsement test — Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas are on the record as opposing the test, and Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito seem likely to take the same view. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:29 pm by Ilya Somin
UPDATE #3: I should briefly explain why it matters that these cases be able to go forward in federal court rather than state court. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am by Zachary Price
For all the reasons addressed earlier, I find this view unpersuasive as a matter of first principles. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 7:52 am by admin
Reform (Feb. 2021); Thomas D. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:18 am by Dan Bressler
.'” “As for the legality, Taylor also pointed out she discussed the matter with the prosecutor’s office and the Idaho State Bar, and everyone had determined that it was all fine. [read post]