Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 12,221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
Contrast that with (Winter v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
It appears that the judge took the view that because some people think that an England football captain is a “role model” then anyone who accepts the job must accept a greater degree of intrusion into his private life. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested [further] and… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
For many people, a life in MCS is a more terrifying prospect than a purely vegetative existence. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
It appears that the judge took the view that because some people think that an England football captain is a “role model” then anyone who accepts the job must accept a greater degree of intrusion into his private life. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
EPA failed to conduct its proper due diligence and now the American people will be forced to pay the price. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:00 am
In the case of the United States of America v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:22 am
The QR code feature is interesting, but similar features never took off so it will probably remain a niche product, at least for the time being. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:47 am
More on on Jurek v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:35 am
kcentv.com has further reporting on United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:31 am
He believed leaders were trying to get as many people to go to Iraq as possible, he testified. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
McMahon v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm
The Court held that when a legislator votes, he is acting as a trustee for the people, and is not speaking at all. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:01 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:21 am
" I understand what she is saying as a legal matter -- thanks to Employment Division v. [read post]
