Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 15,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 8:57 pm
Arden.A newspaper’s inflated circulation claims could not form the basis of a Lanham Act false advertising action brought by the publisher of a free television guide because the publisher did not begin soliciting advertisers until after the newspaper publicly acknowledged its misstatements and revised its circulation claims and because the inflated circulation figures were not part of a commercial campaign, according to the federal district court in Central Islip, New York (Conte… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:18 pm
In 2011, the California Supreme Court held in Pineda v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:29 pm
Particularly when combined with the fact that Pacific's counsel can't come up with any explanation for why the figures on my paystub are so radically different than the figures submitted to the state other than the lame excuse that the people in payroll must have been confused. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
These are smart people on the Court, surely they could find a reason to return these political cases back to the elected branches and say, "you guys have to figure this out. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
HipSaver, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:23 am
by Dennis Crouch Jack Frolow v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am
Sullivan cited in support Lewis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
And on the constitutional front, the focus in US v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
A Guide to Limiting the Damage Done by the Supremes in MayoNow the Patent Office and the courts have the unenviable task of trying to figure out what the Supreme Court really meant in Mayo v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
USPS v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 7:36 am
A ruling last week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Citizens Bank v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 2:30 am
Describing its own ruling as a “mixed bag,” a federal court found that a company committed three separate torts under Pennsylvania law when it took over a discharged executive’s LinkedIn account for two weeks and posted her successor’s image and information on the page (Eagle v Morgan, No. 11-4303, March 12, 2013). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
A ruling last week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Citizens Bank v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:05 am
Mark Thomas of the Rocket Docket IP Blog reports on an important Seventh Circuit decision, Edgenet, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
[Plaintiff] agreed to participate in [defendant’s] sales video.Polett v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
