Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 9121 - 9140 of 36,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2017, 10:54 am by Karen Gullo
Since 2014, EFF’s stupid patent blog series has called attention to questionable patents that stifle innovation, harm the public, or can be employed to shake down users of commonplace processes or technologies. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:06 am by Kate Tummarello
H.R. 387 would codify the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:39 pm
The past several semesters, the class on OSHA has included discussion of Seaworld of Fla. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:27 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Perry’s indictment is an example of ‘criminalization of party differences’Judge OKs retaliation suit by Pennsylvania ex-police chief demoted after reporting cop’s sex abuse photos  A Criminal Mind: Do harms of criminalization outweigh the benefits? [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff can sue these fellas under Section 1983.The case is Gleason v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Preliminary Objections by a NY defendant firm contesting jurisdiction in a legal malpractice case were denied in the matter of Rock v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:50 pm
“We agree with the motion judge that it was plain and obvious, and beyond all reasonable doubt, that the appellant could not succeed in its claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, taking without compensation, negligent misrepresentation and negligence, and intentional infliction of economic harm. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff's proposed amendment did not allege facts establishing that Plaintiff had an "imminent apprehension of harmful or offensive contact" to support a claim for assault. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury awarded each of them $18 million, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Restivo v. [read post]