Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 29,723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 1:58 pm
We know, we know… we’re the Ebenezer Scrooge of legal blogs. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:58 pm
We know, we know… we’re the Ebenezer Scrooge of legal blogs. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Clearly the majority of average users of social media will not think twice about the copyright implications of re-tweeting or otherwise re-publishing other people's comments or photographs, and in the main this is probably something which can be tolerated when no-one is being deprived of any actual financial benefit which might otherwise be due to them as authors. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
Worth the Paper They’re Written On? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:03 am
Instead of Pinocchios, we're left with "No Rating": Clinton says that in speaking with the families she did not blame the Benghazi attacks on the video. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:16 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 10:05 pm
She was kind enough to leave us some departing thoughts on the work she did for our readers. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
Taking into account the nature of the readers of the email, the Judge essentially accepted the claimant’s contentions on meaning, holding that the natural and ordinary meaning of the email was “(a) While employed by the defendant, CSP, the claimant has regularly supplied commercially important, confidential information about CSP’s business and its customers’ businesses to CSP’s commercial rivals in breach of his contractual obligations to his… [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
"Brandi quoted Grits declaring that “There’s absolutely been a change, and we’re still seeing where the splits are. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 3:44 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
Like what you're reading? [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 4:52 am
The Inequality Reader: Contemporary and Foundational Readings in Race, Class, and Gender (Westview Press, 2nd ed., 2011). [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 4:27 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 3:31 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm
Accordingly, when interpreting a contract a judge should avoid re-writing it in an attempt to assist an unwise party or to penalise an astute party. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Grant Award: You’re contacted and told you’ve qualified for a government grant, but you need to pay a processing/delivery fee. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
While this “stop selling” or “never sell” theory has been labeled in various ways (including “fraud on the FDA”) to meet the plaintiff’s particular needs, it seems to us like a re-framing of design defect, albeit without pesky requirements like a feasible alternative design, no liability with adequate (or without inadequate) warnings, or proximate cause. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 4:52 am
That’s because they’re guilty. [read post]
