Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 10,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Chief Prosecutor Brigadier General Mark Martins and James Connell, counsel for Baluchi, both confirm that they are ready to proceed on the matter. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Statute stating that “any judgment . . . shall . . . bear post-judgment interest” requires interest on entire judgment, including any portion consisting of pre-judgment interest. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:55 pm
Vanderbilt law professor James F. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
” (See, for example, James L. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:19 pm
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:52 am
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:07 pm
See Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:34 am
• The 25th Anniversary of McCleskey v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am
Also see James Sample’s Court Reform Enters the Post-Caperton Era at One-Click Download. [6] Ed Haden & Conrad Anderson, IV, Professional Responsibility & Legal Education, Electing State Judges: Unpleasant, But Not Unconstitutional, Engage Volume 9, Issue 2, June 2008 [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
#9: Gordon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
In a Term in which the Court was not considering the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Texas’s redistricting plans, and Arizona’s controversial efforts to regulate immigration, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
Outback Bowl Outback BowlRaymond James Stadium, Tampa, Florida - Monday, January 1, 2007, 11:00 a.m. [read post]
