Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 9121 - 9140 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2008, 7:11 am
The current state of play, as I understand it, is (1) as to amputees a doctor who performed the surgery might very well lose his license or at least be subject to significant critcism from bioethicists, and the state certainly would not pay for it or allow a tax deduction. (2) As to the trans person in distress, there are many doctors who would perform the surgery and it is generally accepted by medical ethics. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
The WSJ Health Blog, "Feds Fight to Keep Doctor Data Secret," has the latest on the Consumers' Checkbook v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:40 am
If doctors must participate but doctors cannot participate, then executions cannot be performed. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Mike Easley to resume executions and ignore a state law requiring a doctor be present for the lethal injection. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
They also showed that doctors and others with medical training were not on duty during executions to make sure the drugs were injected properly. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
In both cases, the Sixth found that no prejudice occurred.The Sixth started last Monday, April 7th, with its opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
" He said that "unless you treat the underlying cause," which might include mental illness, drug addiction, or anger-management issues, "you're like a doctor who's attempting to cure a disease by only treating the symptoms. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:34 am
  The lethal injection index, with coverage of Baze v. [read post]