Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 9121 - 9140 of 16,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
  Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
Our Supreme Court has stated Rule 4:50-1(a) “‘is designed to reconcile the strong interests in finality of judgments and judicial efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm by Ronald Mann
In the United States, merchants have challenged the fees in a seemingly endless series of antitrust cases, one of which (Visa v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court declared the Tenure of Office Act unconstitutional in its ruling in Myers v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Chris Seaton
The TBA applauds the Supreme Court’s strong leadership on indigent representation reform. [read post]