Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 16,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2014, 4:53 pm
The actions of the defendant will only constitute a refusal only if he was warned against it as stated in White v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:57 pm
So holds today’s California Court of Appeal decision in Digital Music News LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:28 pm
The Special Term holds that the guardian had established a strong likelihood that he would ultimately succeed in proving that his wards had a constitutionally-protected right to live, that they would be irreparably damaged if a preliminary injunction were denied and that a balancing of the equities was clearly in favor of the unborn infants. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:55 am
” Finally, while he argued his strong work performance and the company’s success during his tenure amounted to further proof that his discharge was retaliatory for protected conduct, the plaintiff offered no evidence to show that the company or the outside directors perceived his performance as strong. [read post]
14 May 2014, 3:47 am
Whether Google decides to test its power, to challenge whether the EU, or any other governmental entity, is strong enough to make the internet bend to its will, is at stake. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:20 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:09 pm
As the AP story quoted above points out, this is just one of many federal and state judicial rulings striking down laws banning same-sex marriage issued since the federal Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:21 am
Another Supreme Court decision, the ruling in April in Schuette v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
Oracle once stated its intent to "bring Android back into the Java fold" by making Google comply with the Java rules the rest of the industry has accepted. [read post]
12 May 2014, 10:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 5:05 am
The full statement, on a television broadcast, was this (KBMT Operating Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:02 am
And in the wake of the Court’s recent decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:00 am
Employees v Huntington, 2014 NY Slip Op 03271, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublic Officers Law §18*permits a political or civil subdivision of the State whose governing body has agreed by the adoption of local law, by-law, resolution, rule or regulation to “confer the benefits of the section” upon its employees, and (ii) to be held liable for the costs incurred under these provisions including the defense and indemnification its officers and employees,… [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm
It would be disappointing if Apple decided to keep on suing without having identified really strong claims and without having an endgame strategy. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:36 pm
He had a strong health and safety background. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:00 pm
V. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:25 am
The antebellum Comity Clause decision Corfield v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:42 am
In particular, local agencies should not be subject to the same strict non-delegation doctrine by which state agencies are arguably constrained under Boreali v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. 14; Hislop v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:48 am
The filing in Elmbrook School District v. [read post]
