Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 15,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2013, 10:00 pm
See also case of People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:53 pm
In Tyler v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:20 pm
As regards, s.112 of the Patents Act 1977, the "Level 4" maximum fine still stands at £2,500 ..., this sum not having (yet) been increased from the figure decreed in 1991. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
[By Venkat with comments from Eric] Eagle v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:30 am
So I can see where the trial court's coming from.For this reason, were I writing the opinion -- or were I the San Diego Superior Court figuring out how to respond to the Court of Appeal's ruling -- I think I'd suggest a simple solution. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:22 am
Lockwood v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:16 am
Fund v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
App. 1984) (testimony that 43 percent of child molestations were committed by "father-figures," in a case where defendant was a father-figure, was "extremely prejudicial and should not have been admitted")State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:23 am
Somerson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:51 am
A ruling last week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Citizens Bank v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:10 am
The 1,600 figure above only represents the lawsuits initiated by catastrophically injured auto accident victims. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Mobileye, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:16 am
” As made clear last week in the very first IPR filing, IPR2012-00001 (Garmin International Inc, et al v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 1:00 am
For those of you who are casual or non-esq readers of the blog, or for those of you who wear a black robe to work, the landmark case of Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm
Some commenters striving to figure out a way the EU Data Protection Directive would apply have pointed to the Department of Commerce’s EU Safe Harbor Program. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:28 pm
A ruling last week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Citizens Bank v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
David Mayer Naman, the OHIM registered the figurative Community trade mark David Mayer (CTM No. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Soemtimes I can figure things out on my own, even when they're not expressly stated. [read post]
