Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 58,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Unzueta v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
GOVERNOR BROWN ASKED TO COMMUTE SHIRLEY REE SMITH’S SENTENCE AFTER SUPREME COURT REINSTATES SENTENCE
5 Jan 2012, 11:17 pm
The Supreme Court denied her appeal, showing deference to the jury’s verdict and state court decision uphonding her conviction it reversed a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal’s ruling granting her habeas. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:51 am
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:53 am
A further report on the second case discussed at this seminar, R (Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health, will be posted on this blog in due course. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:36 am
There really isn't an appropriate photo for this case.State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:30 pm
BECKY COOPER v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:16 am
In Schorsch v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
In Thorne v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:36 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 7:28 am
(Terrien v Zwitt, 467 Mich 56, 66-67).Courts must find public policy in objective sources. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:22 am
The case, Dixon v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:30 am
**Rejecting Claimant’s argument to the contrary, the Appellate Division said that the appointing authority “was not obligated to offer [Claimant] a part-time position as a laborer,” following his termination from his heavy equipment operator position, citing Matter of Ramirez [Commissioner of Labor], 84 AD3d at 1657.* See, for example, Matter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 77 AD3d 1399; Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:01 am
(Eugene Volokh) From State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
The March 6, 2013 Court of Appeals opinion in Barber v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 2:48 pm
As absurd as this sounds, the recent murder case of People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Her email address is marcih@sas.upenn.edu. [read post]
