Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 23,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
In 2002, Rosetta, won an appeal affirming a trial judge's decision not to enjoin Rosetta from selling eBook editions of Random House's Slaughterhouse Five, Sophie's Choice and other bestselling backlist titles.Summation The Rosetta Books decision reminds us that eBooks have been poised to cannibalize books in print for over decade. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:26 am
At the Apple v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
Allbirds, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:34 am
The court said that Citadel had not exhausted all available administrative remedies before turning to the courts for relief (Citadel Securities, LLC, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:28 am
Engram v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 3:24 am
Snowcats LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm
The event usually sells out, so don’t delay. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:05 am
The Division alleged what Weber and Rothouse sold to Iowans in “cold call” sales pitches were unregistered securities and constituted securities fraud (Weber v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 4:00 am
Minden Pictures - Stock Photography In Minden Pictures,Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
New Jersey Physicians United Reciprocal Exchange v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:10 pm
In Xilinx v Papst Licensing, a German patent troll, Pabst, accused Xilinx of infringing a patent relating to memory tests in electronics. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:08 am
Unknown to her, plaintiff's picture was sold to Getty Images, which compiles and sells stock photos. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:40 am
Du Pont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:06 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:18 am
The suit is for specific performance of an agreement to sell an immovable property and has been pending from 2011. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:15 am
In a recent Forbes article, Brad Newberg discussed in depth the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Petrella v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:29 pm
Potential inducers of patent infringement here could be the sellers of the 3D printers, someone providing CAD files of the patented device, or websites that sell or share various CAD files that instruct the 3D printer to make the patented invention.IPBiz notes In a 6-2 decision in June 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:19 am
One Wholesaler, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Lawyers Hid Fatal Flaw, From Critics and One Another Spousal killers shouldn't get survivor benefits: BC victim's daughterClippers owner Sterling reluctant to sell team unless NBA revokes ban Arizona Judge Rules Pot Can Be Used For PTSD The Increasing Scope Of Auditors' Negligence: "Livent Inc. v. [read post]
