Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 10,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 11:08 am
United States, includes an analysis that comes down squarely in favor of the better reading of Section 4, that language was arguably dicta. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Petitioners also state that separate "insurance cards" are necessary. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
This is kind of ridiculous even without the Roman numerals (though I could give you about XCIV reasons why you shouldn’t go above V with those). [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
Because the EO talks a lot but has little direct impact, it’s not a serious reform effort. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:04 am
Elrod v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:25 am
When the Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Moreover, particularly in the United States, constitutional and other legal constraints limit governments’ ability to control what happens on global private networks and what private actors do. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:52 am
Tushnet and Yackle, in a study of statutory reform in the United States (available here) look at three kinds of statutes - expressive, instrumental and symbolic. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:48 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 5:12 am
Of course, the terrorists who attacked the United States on 9/11 were radical Muslim, not Bahai, Calvinists or Pastafarians, and some will shrug at this detail. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:24 am
Case citation: The Authors’ Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm
"Well, now that's a little more direct, an administration official stating that the Fairness Doctrine was used to harass political opponents. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
The Eighth Circuit's case of United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:55 am
United States (No. 09-2308). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:31 pm
United States, 72 Fed. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
The case was Glossip v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 2:05 am
Today’s ministerial statement justifies the abolition of success fees in media law cases, citing the decision of the European Convention of Human Rights in MGN v United Kingdon (2011) 39401/04, stating “In the MGN case, the court concluded that the obligation for the defendant to pay a 100% ‘success fee’ to the claimant was disproportionate, and that the conditional fee agreements regime was therefore in breach of the… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
This Kat has a little riddle with which to tease her readers. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
