Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 9161 - 9180 of 27,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Wage & Hour Blogger
  While the Department of Labor has stated that automatic deductions are lawful under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), these policies may run afoul of basic FLSA principles if employers are not careful. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
For a similar recent case from the neighboring state of Lousiana, also involving criticism of a judge during an election campaign, see Bartholomew-Woods v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:26 pm by Jon Sands
  African Americans are under 6% of the population but an absolute disparity, as laid down in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:10 am by Charles Kotuby
This settles a long-running split among the federal courts in the United States, and (though the parties and even the Court disagree on this to some extent) it also signals an emerging consensus among the courts of the various contracting states on this issue. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:05 am by Lyle Denniston
  That question was before the Court in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:44 pm by Lisa Whittaker
Barnett, which stated “inflexible” policies can “provide important employee benefits by creating, and fulfilling, employee expectations of fair, uniform treatment. [read post]