Search for: "Angle v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 1,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
United States; Jess Bravin of the Journal was there, too. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 10:33 am by petrocohen
  Additionally, he has an “A/V” rating from the world’s leading lawyer referral service, Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
I've been thinking and writing about platform must-carry rules for years, and I still learn new things or discover new angles regularly. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm by PJ Blount
(a) Section 40117(l)(7) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking `August 2, 2010. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 7:30 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Many of my reports focused on climate change from various angles. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 TM clerk was very different from patent counterparts—technical expertise v. experts in delicate art of distinguishing and classifying signs and words. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:59 pm by Larry Downes
Supreme Court will hear arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
In this contribution, we explore this discrepancy of interests from the angle of the principle of transparency. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
This international application filed under the PCT [hereinafter referred to as "international application" or "subsequent application"], for which the EPO acted as designated Office, had been filed in the name of Tenaris Connections AG as applicant for all designated states except the United States of America and of five natural persons as applicants for the United States of America on 6 September 2003. [read post]