Search for: "CLASS v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED" Results 901 - 920 of 2,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Corber 13-1016Issue: Whether plaintiffs’ request, pursuant to state court procedures, to coordinate numerous multi-plaintiff lawsuits involving claims of more than 100 persons against dozens of non-resident defendants for all purposes constitutes a “mass action” removable under the Class Action Fairness Act. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
It makes the list over several other similar decisions because it's a state appellate court in a difficult jurisdiction for defendants. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  He cites the DPIC's so-called "innocence list" as if it actually were a list of actual innocents. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected each of these theories, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety as a matter of law this past week in Dimond, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:53 pm by Shaun McParland Baldwin
   Thus any TCPA claims asserted by business entities, as the class members, against a defendant will not implicate the “personal and advertising injury” coverage of the defendant’s CGL policy. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
  In [CAFA], Congress enabled defendants to remove to federal court any sizable class action involving minimal diversity of citizenship. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
As always, the list contains the petitions on the Court's paid docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
Feigelson “is listed as an involved person on all of the police reports and will likely be called to testify about these incidents. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
In Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited [2010] EWHC 2661 (Comm), the English Commercial Court was asked to consider the effect on a contract of insurance of an order made by the UK Government for the purposes of preventing nuclear proliferation.The Background The claimant, Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), was a member of the defendant Protection & Indemnity Insurance Club, Steamship Mutual… [read post]