Search for: "Case v. People" Results 901 - 920 of 51,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:45 am
Here are some NY state cases this week in Legal Malpractice:1.Max Markus Katz, et al., appellants, v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., respondent. [read post]
ACT had started infringement cases not only against Oppo (and Vivo) at Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court but also against Xiaomi and TCL Electronics at Shanghai Intellectual Property Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
  San Diego Police Sergeant Charles Lara drove into the Motel 6's parking lot and saw people pointing north. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Separate reasons in Oliver Douglas v McLernon [No 3] were published by His Honour in respect of a “no case to answer” submission made by Toni Fitzgerald in one of the proceedings. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:49 pm
A case which helps establish -- if one didn't know it already -- that the real world is very rarely identical to the movies.For example, in many ways, the crime in this case is very similar to the one in Ocean's Eleven. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:27 pm by Joseph Stacey
Hand injuries can be devastating and sometimes career-ending for people who work at sea. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:49 pm
It's a pattern that's not unique to this particular case. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am by INFORRM
In the case of ZXC v Bloomberg LP ([2019] EWHC 970 (QB)) a businessman was awarded damages of £25,000 for misuse of private information after media organisation Bloomberg published an article citing confidential information obtained from a UK law enforcement agency which identified the businessman. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:43 am
But the Court of Appeal reversed, holding that there was legitimate probable cause and thus "objective factors justified official action" sufficient to preclude a finding of actual innocence.A holding that may well have been motivated by the especially touching facts of the case. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
"  It's not a sex crime case, or other situation in which we're typically hesitant to identify the victim. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:38 am by Andres
The case is that of Naruto v Slater, where PETA sued British photographer David Slater for copyright infringement, claiming to be acting on behalf of Naruto the monkey. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:18 am by Corporate Action Network
And that’s what makes the case against Chevron a compelling story for film – not unlike the Doe v. [read post]