Search for: "Laws v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 155,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
Regina (AM and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another Court of Appeal “Allegations of inhuman or degrading treatment of inmates at a privately run immigration detention centre should have been investigated by the Secretary of State for the Home Department to meet the United Kingdom's obligation under article 3 of the [...] [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:38 am
Pape and its ruling that, where state action is present, section 1983’s color of law requirement is thereby met. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:23 pm
Circuit Review – United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:37 am
Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence [2010] EWCA Civ 758; [2010] WLR (D) 182 “The claimant’s right under Iraqi law not to be deprived of his liberty ‘except in accordance with the law and based on a decision by a competent judicial authority’ and his right not to be kept in custody ‘except according to a judicial decision’ were not infringed by his internment without trial until 30 December 2007 after arrest by British… [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:03 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:54 am
Regina (Modhej and another) v Secretary of State for Justice: [2012] EWCA Civ 957; [2012] WLR (D) 210 “Where the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against sentence at a time by which, subsequent to the original passing of sentence, the law had changed in relation to release on licence, it was not the case that reliance could be placed on the particularities of such date in order to claim that it was the later provisions which governed… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:11 am
Read the opinion The post ERIC GREENBERG v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:58 pm
United States on the issue of the constitutionality of Arizona's notorious SB 1070, signed into law by Governor Jan Brewer two years ago. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:11 pm
United States (Buffalo Law... [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
I think the Law Court got things wrong recently, in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
In the course of writing a forthcoming Update: Costs for the Solicitors Journal, concerning naming the wrong defendant in a CFA, I was considering the case of Law v Liverpool City Council [2005] EWHC 90020 (Costs) which deals with this issue. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 1:08 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:33 pm
Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cruz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday ruled in a 5-4 split decision in Pliva v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (Al-Saadoon and Another) v Secretary of State for Defence Court of Appeal “Iraqi detainees held in a United Kingdom internment facility in Iraq on the authority of the local criminal court were not under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:39 am
Duncombe and Others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families Court of Appeal “Staff regulations restricting to nine years the period of employing teachers seconded by the Department of Children, Schools and Families to work in the European Schools, which provided education to the children of bureaucrats of the European Union, were unlawful. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:09 am
Regina (Al-Sweady and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The complete integrity of public interest immunity certificates and the schedules attached to them, signed by ministers of the Crown, was absolutely essential in all cases in which they were put forward. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:09 am
Fidler v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Queen’s Bench Division “The erection and removal of straw bales, which concealed a new dwelling constructed without planning permission, formed part of the totality of building operations originally contemplated and intended to be carried out by the claimant. [read post]
