Search for: "Laws v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 156,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:47 am
Yesterday, we posted the immigration law law professors amici curiae brief in Texas v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:45 pm
In the recent case, Heiting v. the United States, an appellate court denied a claim-of-right deduction in accordance with Section 1341 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:16 am
Preempting Immigration Detainer Enforcement Under Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:55 am
Timbrell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 701; [2010] WLR (D) 155 The Gender Recognition Act 2004 did not have retrospective effect, and since the United Kingdom had failed to implement the relevant Community law Directive within the time permitted so far as concerned acquired gender and rights to pensions, an individual could invoke the Directive as its provisions were unconditional and precise. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
Regina (AM and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another Court of Appeal “Allegations of inhuman or degrading treatment of inmates at a privately run immigration detention centre should have been investigated by the Secretary of State for the Home Department to meet the United Kingdom's obligation under article 3 of the [...] [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:23 pm
Circuit Review – United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:38 am
Pape and its ruling that, where state action is present, section 1983’s color of law requirement is thereby met. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:37 am
Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence [2010] EWCA Civ 758; [2010] WLR (D) 182 “The claimant’s right under Iraqi law not to be deprived of his liberty ‘except in accordance with the law and based on a decision by a competent judicial authority’ and his right not to be kept in custody ‘except according to a judicial decision’ were not infringed by his internment without trial until 30 December 2007 after arrest by British… [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:03 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:54 am
Regina (Modhej and another) v Secretary of State for Justice: [2012] EWCA Civ 957; [2012] WLR (D) 210 “Where the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against sentence at a time by which, subsequent to the original passing of sentence, the law had changed in relation to release on licence, it was not the case that reliance could be placed on the particularities of such date in order to claim that it was the later provisions which governed… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:11 am
Read the opinion The post ERIC GREENBERG v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:58 pm
United States on the issue of the constitutionality of Arizona's notorious SB 1070, signed into law by Governor Jan Brewer two years ago. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:11 pm
United States (Buffalo Law... [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
I think the Law Court got things wrong recently, in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
In the course of writing a forthcoming Update: Costs for the Solicitors Journal, concerning naming the wrong defendant in a CFA, I was considering the case of Law v Liverpool City Council [2005] EWHC 90020 (Costs) which deals with this issue. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday ruled in a 5-4 split decision in Pliva v. [read post]
