Search for: "Michael Dorf"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf Tomorrow (Wed., May 16), I'll be a panelist at a UCLA Law School conference, Animals and the Law: Multiple Perspectives. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm
Also, Professor Michael Dorf and George Washington University’s Neil H. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:15 am
The best quote comes from Columbia Law professor Michael Dorf: "The claim by judges that they have no use for law review articles seems to me an anti-intellectual know-nothingism that is understandable but regrettable. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
A Mistake in the Early 1970s Still Haunts Supreme Court Ethics, by Michael Bobelian. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:01 pm
During last week’s oral argument in the same-sex marriage cases, Justice Antonin Scalia posed an arresting question for the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Mary Bonauto: If she wins a constitutional right to same-sex marriage for her clients, would that mean that clergy who will not officiate at same-sex wedding ceremonies would forfeit the power to officiate at opposite-sex wedding ceremonies? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am
Michael C. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
On New Year’s Eve, Justice Sonia Sotomayor granted a temporary injunction against the enforcement of the contraceptive coverage requirements of the regulations implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly known as Obamacare). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
, by Michael Dorf (May 6, 2015) Justice Alito Asks Whether Non-Romantic Couples Should Have the Right to Marry: Absurd Question? [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
So far, big tech has had a busy April at the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:36 pm
As Cornell law professor Michael Dorf points out in the summary of the poll results linked above: “This result is not especially surprising nor, by itself, should it be alarming,” said Michael C. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
While most commentators suggest that this change would give the states greater autonomy on abortion policy, Cornell Law Professor Michael Dorf notes that Congress - if it remains under GOP control - might adopt new abortion restrictions of its own. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:50 pm
"The law is very clear, but it's not 100 percent clear that the courts would enforce that law rather than leave it to the political process," said Columbia University Law School professor Michael Dorf, an expert in constitutional law. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 5:16 am
(Thomas Keck, The Washington Post) Biden’s SCOTUS Commission Apparently Lacks Authority To Make Recommendations And Is (Way) Too Large (Michael Dorf, Dorf on Law) Biden’s Supreme Court Commission Is Designed to Fail (Elie Mystal, The Nation) How a Cheerleader’s Snapchat Profanity Could Shape the Limits of Students’ Free Speech (Mark Walsh, Education Week) Supreme Court conservatives may reset balance between LGBTQ rights and religious liberty ($)… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:17 am
(Michael Dorf, Dorf on Law) Iowa awaits ruling affecting farming and ethanol production after Supreme Court arguments (Donnelle Eller, Des Moines Register) The post The morning read for Wednesday, April 28 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 7:46 am
Dorf, Dorf on Law) The post The morning read for Tuesday, Feb. 22 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:02 am
Lyle Denniston covered the latest proceedings for this blog; other coverage and analysis come from Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, and Leland E. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
By Mike Dorf (Below is a slightly amended version of the original post, modified to clarify my argument in response to a private email.) [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
By Mike Dorf Taken to its logical extreme, the NIMBY phenomenon--"not in my back yard"--leads to BANANA--"build absolutely nothing anywhere near anyone," because if some site is undesirable in X's backyard, it will often be undesirable in Y's backyard. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:22 pm
Although I generally support a rather narrow view of standing, I largely agree with Michael Dorf that it would be anomalous were state officials able to effectively nullify state ballot initiatives simply by refusing to defend such initiatives in Court. [read post]
