Search for: "SMITH et al. v. SMITH et al."
Results 901 - 920
of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Kappos et al., Case No. 2010-1534, perhaps starting (or ending) another chapter in the saga over a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Landow Aviation LP, et al. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC - Federal Circuit says ‘declaratory judgment jurisdiction’ even if patent holder’s notice avoids phrases like ‘infringement’ and ‘assertion’ (Patents4Life) Except as provided elsewhere, or trumped, I’ll own all the IP – Delaware Chancery Court reminds of risks of wholesale incorporation by reference between separate IP agreements and judicial misreading of patent law: Cepahlon v Johns… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Newport News School Bd, et al. , 2023 Va. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
As Adam Smith recognized in The Theory of the Moral Sentiments, business as an institution depends on certain basic moral principles and understandings.[15] Even in his more famous and influential The Wealth of Nations,[16] Smith recognized that promoting excessively “high profits” for capitalists could undermine the economic wealth and moral well-being of a nation as a whole.[17] In my article, I draw also on the contemporary social philosopher Axel Honneth, who… [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, et al., 2009 WL 73274 (N.D.Ill. 03/16/09). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
No harm, no foul is a good rule to live by. 233 Ga.App. 498 CHAMBLEY et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
Hovenkamp & Norman V. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
LaFave et al., Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 2.1(e) (6th ed. 2020). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
Harlow v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
