Search for: "STONE v. CASE" Results 901 - 920 of 2,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
The Ninth Chamber of the General Court gave judgment today in a fierce battle over a Community trade mark application in Case T‑170/12, Beyond Retro Ltd v OHIM, the other party to the proceedings being a US company, S&K Garments, Inc., which was victorious in the Board of Appeal. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
| GC on ‘Monaco’ trade mark in Case T-197/13 Monaco v OHIM | Corriere della Sera major infringement in Charlie Hebdo case | GoPro and Apple patent | Biotech patent case law.Never too late 28 [week ending Sunday 11 January] -- German Minister for Agriculture against GIs | Europe’s 2015 resolutions re innovation | All the must-read IP blogs | UK and EU Parliaments v the EPO | The bizzarre EPO BoA’s Business… [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh looks at Monday’s second case, Georgia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
, Neil Wilkof recalls the relationship between the Rolling Stones and Chess Records, in whose studios the “2120 South Michigan Avenue” composition was recorded in 1964.No measure of success in passing off cup caseRosie Burbidge analyses George East Housewares Ltd v Fackelmann GmbH & Co KG & Probus Creative Housewares Ltd, [2016] EWHC 2476 (IPEC). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Gans responds in continuing discussion of next Term’s campaign finance case, McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:43 am by Katherine Stone
Stone is Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Distinguished Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law. [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 6:32 pm by Christopher S. Jones
Remains to be seen if Plaintiffs will take another shot and amend.You can read Romero v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 2:03 pm
Because the case is the Rosetta Stone of judicial review in administrative law, the word Pushpanathan was mentioned a lot. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
The General Court gave its decision today in a Community trade mark appeal, Case T-369/10 You-Q BV v OHIM. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
However, the tests employed to determine liability in the case of secondary asbestos exposure are not set in stone and differ from state court to state court. [read post]