Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2010, 4:27 am
Consultants, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
Select Entangled Legalities beyond the State Entangled Legalities beyond the State pp i-i PDF HTML Select Global Law Series - Series page Global Law Series - Series page pp ii-ii PDF HTML Select Entangled Legalities beyond the State - Title page Entangled Legalities beyond the State - Title page pp iii-iii PDF HTML Select Copyright page Copyright page pp iv-iv PDF HTML Select Contents Contents pp v-vii… [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:44 pm
The event is being held around the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:00 pm
See Sav-On Drug Stores v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:09 am
Partnership v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:33 pm
The Court noticed this in Texas Monthly v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
A Classic David vs. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:15 am
Although fair share agreements are not authorized in all states, there is a classic collective action problem at work. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 8:27 pm
On February 6, the Fifth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
