Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 901 - 920 of 1,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm by Gregory Forman
United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates equal protection and is therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:06 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
United States Air Force, in which a federal court held that Don't Ask, Don't Tell was unconstitutional, just before it was repealed by Congress. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:52 pm
Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946)United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:50 pm by Steven M. Taber
Aviation statutes specifically state that “[t]he United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm by Justin Silverman
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War);  Florida Star v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm by Justin Silverman
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War);  Florida Star v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:02 pm
The Court added to this review the question of the Ninth Circuit Court's jurisdiction to review a remand order by the District Court. 06-134, India Permanent Mission to the United Nations v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:29 pm by Chuck Ramsay
It’s called a Frye-Mack hearing in Minnesota based upon two reported cases that outlined the procedure; United States v. [read post]