Search for: "Does 1-100" Results 9181 - 9200 of 14,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Kent Services Ltd.19 The rule was effectively applied 100 years ago by the House of Lords in TW Thomas & Co. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:43 am by admin
  You could (i) find an attorney, (ii) schedule and appointment, (iii) drive to the appointment and meet with an attorney, (iv) wait to review a draft of your documents, (v) schedule a follow-up appointment, (vi) drive to the attorney’s office for a second visit to sign the document, and (vii) expect to pay $100 to $200. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:04 am by Mark Tushnet
I'm less sure about this (if it weren't the summer I'd consult with some colleagues on it), but I think that the following, from a recently published article in a top-ten law review, is wrong (describing the concept of linear and non-linear dose-response rates): "The relationship might be linear, inwhich case if 1 gram of exposure causes a 1-in-100 risk of cancer, 0.01 grams of exposure should cause a 1-in-10,000 risk of cancer; or, the… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm by Anna Gelpern
In this case, pro rata would mean that the restructured debt gets 30 or so cents on the dollar (their new contract), while the holdout debt gets 100 cents (the old contract). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
In other words, the number of `matters’ (here, the number of computers) does not in itself define the proper unit of prosecution. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
 This public comment period does not meet with the 60-day standard of Executive Order 13563, but that is not surprising in light of the posture of the reconsideration and the litigation. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm by Zachary Spilman
The Appellant was sentenced to confinement for eight months, reduction to E-1, and a bad conduct discharge. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:18 am by Daniel Shaviro
  Thus, if I get invited to participate in some great IPO, and buy a share of stock for $1, then I give it to a charity when its value has increased to $1 million, I get to deduct the full $1 million even though I never paid tax on the appreciation and am only out of pocket $1. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:37 am
Some said it appeared as if he was "going 100 miles per hour," though that is almost certainly an exaggeration. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:26 am by hwuason2012
Where an Applicant collects its income through an agent or entrusted receiver (hereinafter collectively “Agent”), no matter the Agent is a resident of a contracting state or not, the identification of the Applicant’s beneficial owner status shall not be affected, but the Agent shall represent to the tax authority that it does not have a beneficial owner status. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
The students were asked to rate their certainty on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being “Definitely Plagiarism’ and 5 being “Definitely not plagiarism”. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:56 am by Michael Scutt
Hopefully, but does anyone know how many there are at the moment in any event? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:53 am by admin
USP also owns 100 percent of the stock of TFC, a foreign corporation. [read post]