Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 9181 - 9200 of 12,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 7:02 am by Joel R. Brandes
It observed that Domestic Relations Law 240(1-b)(b)(5)(iv)(B) provides that the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, "attribute or impute income from ... automobiles or other perquisites that are provided as part of compensation for employment to the extent [they] constitute expenditures for personal use, or ... directly or indirectly confer personal economic benefits. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:32 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Facts In a nutshell, a Dutch company, Arilco Holland, had transfered monies (Euro 1 million) to a Dutch investment company, Prism Investment BV. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
John Deere, 383 US 1, 8-9 (1966).Edward C. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:00 pm by admin
Today in America, women still earn an average of 81 cents for every $1 paid to men. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
 A subsequent article in Food Chemical News on Jan. 27, 2003 related how a coalition of public interest groups charged USDA with unfair treatment of an inspector-turned-whistleblower. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
 Ironically, FSIS issued Directive 10,010.1 on Feb. 1, 1998, a mere six days later! [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
" The Interim Ruling summarized the dispute as encompassing two issues: (1) "who has jurisdiction to decide particular substantive issues" and (2) "the substantive issues, namely whether the affirmative defens [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” in R 36(1) does not set a period/time limit, but rather sets a condition; see e.g. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm by Gary Rosin
   The existing draft of Interpretation 301-6 does not change 75%cumulative or -15% first-time benchmarks for Bar passage rates (Chapter 3, pp. 2-4), nor does it upgrade 301-6 from an Interpretation to a Standard. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:22 am by Andrew Dickinson
Does Art. 11 of the proposed Regulation then confer on the CESL rules the status of (party chosen) overriding mandatory provisions under Art. 9(2) of the Rome I Regulation, so as to trump the expressly chosen law, or does the CESL take effect as if incorporated by reference into the contract insofar as this is possible under the chosen law? [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:20 am by AdamSmith1776
However, 27% of these jobs were temporary and an additional 11% were part-time, meaning that the permanent, full-time employment rate was closer to 53%. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Application was presented for No. 1,584, 149 on January 30, 1922; for No. 1,584,150 on July 14, 1923; and for No. 1, 896,020 on April 27, 1926. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:17 pm
I am not certain that I have the answer. 1. [read post]