Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 9181 - 9200 of 10,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2021, 9:38 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Attorneys John Bellinger and Sean Mirski have reported extensively on these cases on the Lawfare blog. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 10:02 pm by Lydia Zuraw
And just this month, Papa John’s pledged to cut antibiotics from its chicken by summer 2016. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:02 am by Brian Connor
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a working paper, John A. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:40 pm by Eric
”Death of the Internet” and “Death of Innovation” Arguments The authors address two common arguments that Internet defendants make to support favorable exceptionalist rulings, including that an adverse ruling (1) will end the Internet or (2) harm innovation. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 11:10 pm
Similarly, the Texans' problems at wide receiver behind Johnson are partially attributable to Kubiak prematurely giving up on an acceptable no. 2 WR, who is now flourishing with the Patriots. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Also, the president’s FY 2016 budget includes over $2 billion to encourage states to establish paid family and medical leave programs. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 2:44 am by SHG
In retrospect, it looks pretty simple:  (1) find a convenient time for 1Ls, (2) provide pizza, (3) invite successful lawyers to talk about their careers, (4) have law faculty gently moderate, and (5) implement a modest attendence requirement tied to a 1L substantive course.Why does this matter? [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:15 am
In other words, you need to think of this process as free advertisement.Let as many people know that "John Doe" the best jockey of the West is racing in the Santa Ana horserace. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 3:14 am by Broc Romanek
“We note…that on pages 1 and 2 you mention that your food is ‘fresh’ five times. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Department of Energy (DOE). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
  If the questions are relevant, the court must then consider the four Wigmore factors:  (1) the relationship must originate in a confidence that the source’s identity will not be disclosed; (2) anonymity must be essential to the relationship in which the communication arises; (3) the relationship must be one that should be sedulously fostered in the public interest; and (4) the public interest served by protecting the identity of the informant… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:27 am
For further information, please contact John Stigi at (310) 228-3717 or Taraneh Fard at (213) 617-5492. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Rory Little
Lane, which attempted to settle this doctrine after twenty years of struggling with ideas first advanced by Justice John Marshall Harlan in 1969, recognized two exceptions to its “non-retroactivity rule:”  (1) new “watershed rules of criminal procedure” should be “fully retroactive” (that is, available on collateral review even for “final” cases); (2) and so too should be “new substantive rules. [read post]