Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 9181 - 9200
of 178,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2009, 7:07 am
Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion in Limine Re Limiting Expert Testimony Plaintiff MOLLY CHANCE hereby opposes defendant's motion for an order limiting plaintiff's expert's testimony to opinions set forth in expert designations and their depositions. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
Black's Prior Sexual Behavior With Individuals Others Than Plaintiff Has No Probative Value And Is Unduly Prejudicial. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 6:28 am
In fact, plaintiff could not even demonstrate that any of her information was stolen from Acxiom’s database. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:02 pm
The lodestar takes the reasonable hourly rate and multiplies it by the reasonable number of hours incurred by counsel, id.; because the district court found that the hours spent by plaintiff’s lawyers were reasonable, the only issue was whether the district abused its discretion in reducing the hourly rate for plaintiff’s lawyers to $200 per hour. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 10:15 pm
It's yet another case -- indeed, the second one today (the first one is here) -- involving a repeat ADA plaintiff. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:28 am
The second defendant disclosed the plaintiff’s HIV status in the meeting and later apologised to the plaintiff in the same meeting. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 5:16 am
Defendants' attempted search of plaintiff's property is not a Fourth Amendment violation. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 5:15 am
This included the Plaintiff’s 401(k) plan. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:36 am
Defendant's motion to stay plaintiff's qui tam false marking case pending the Federal Circuit's resolution of Stauffer v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:44 am
A temporary 209 A restraining order issued based on the plaintiff's claim that the defendant verbally and emotionally abused the plaintiff. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:56 am
$12,500,000 RECOVERY – PLAINTIFF PEDESTRIAN STRUCK BY BUS TURNING LEFT FROM BEHIND HIM AS PLAINTIFF WAS IN CROSSWALK – NYCTA’s INVESTIGATION TEAM CONCLUDED THAT PLAINTIFF WALKED INTO SIDE OF BUS SOME 70 FEET FROM CROSSWALK – PLAINTIFF OBTAINED TRANSCRIPT OF INITIAL CALL BETWEEN DRIVER AND NYCTA THROUGH STATE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAW, IN WHICH DRIVER INDICATED THAT INCIDENT OCCURRED AS BUS WAS TURNING –… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 10:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 1:24 pm
Rasansky’s work on behalf of plaintiffs recognized by Best Lawyers in America DALLAS – Trial lawyer Jeffrey Rasansky of Dallas-based Rasansky Law Firm has been recognized among the top plaintiffs’ personal injury litigation attorneys by The Best Lawyers in America legal guide. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
Plaintiff alleges that this behavior stemmed from discriminatory animus, as Muallem directed it towards only plaintiff and other Black female employees.We also have a retaliation claim based on plaintiff's assertion that "defendants[] forc[ed] plaintiff to move to an office in extremely close proximity to her alleged abuser Muallem while ignoring plaintiff's reasonable plea not to do so. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:02 am
Plaintiff told Ochrim that because of Stanko's behavior, she could not go back to work with him. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
The carrier also moved to dismiss the bad faith claim under the two (2) year statute of limitations under Pennsylvania law.The court upheld a two (2) year suit limitation contained in the policy as there was no merit to the Plaintiff’s claim that Pennsylvania’s four (4) year statue of limitations with contract claims under 42 Pa. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:13 am
There was not sufficient evidence that WD-40 intended to pass off its products as plaintiff’s to support plaintiff’s burden. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:15 pm
To prevail on a claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage in California, a plaintiff must plead and prove (1) an economic relationship between the plaintiff and some third party, with the probability of future economic benefit to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant’s knowledge of the relationship; (3) the defendant’s intentional acts designed to disrupt the relationship; (4) actual disruption of the relationship; and… [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 10:19 pm
The plaintiff side ran a very, very narrow and technical legal argument.They argued that a court would never - read my lips - ever - find that the plaintiff contributed to its own loss as a result of a fraud, notwithstanding the fraud by the defendant's employee went undetected, in large part, because of the plaintiff's woeful back office systems.And they had contributory negligence cases to die for - even a House of Lords decision bang on point… [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
While the next inmate-letter case might prevail in the plaintiff's favor because of Bacon's case, Bacon himself cannot win. [read post]
