Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 11,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
In its last judgment of 2022, the Patents Court issued a decision in the case of Oxford University Innovation Ltd v Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat)). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In Tobinick v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
As Professor Maldonado points out, anti-miscegenation laws were, at one point or another between 1661 and 1967, in effect in 41 states. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
The Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm
In addition, if Amar is right that “Any law, state or federal, heaping disabilities or dishonor upon any citizen by dint of his or her birth status — because he was born black, or because she was born female or out of wedlock — violates a core principle of the Fourteenth Amendment’s opening sentence,” then laws denying the vote to women were banned by the Fourteenth Amendment, and there was no need for the Nineteenth Amendment (which finally banned sex… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
Further Article 15(1) permits the State to take some measures resulting in the infringement of the principle of confidentiality found in Art 5(1) which again “concern activities characteristic of States or State authorities, and are unrelated to fields in which individuals are active” [para 72]. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
The opinion cites to another case (U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
Hair dressers are allowed to enter the profession when they are licensed by a state agency. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 2:28 am
Mattioda v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
Hair dressers are allowed to enter the profession when they are licensed by a state agency. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
Actual use of accessible generative AI models may also provide insights into the state of the art. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:46 am
Hair dressers are allowed to enter the profession when they are licensed by a state agency. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
Take, for example, the recent Supreme Court ruling in the case of Google v Oracle. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:46 pm
Li-ann Thio v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:24 am
In Epperson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:16 am
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Professor Tushnet notes that structural remedies (such as Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
[1] See United States v. [read post]
