Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 25,408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
The status of consumer data security law in the United States is at a crossroads. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:35 pm
” Finally, in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am
On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 1610 The Respondent is the corporate trustee of a tax-exempt United Kingdom pension fund. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
Petitions Granted: Prior Art – On Sale Bar: Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 7:17 am
Specifically, in People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
The Fourth District suggested at some length that the “no set of circumstances test” was vague, difficult to apply, and that it wasn’t entirely clear that even the United States Supreme Court truly adhered to it anymore, citing Washington State Grange v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 11-94Issue(s): Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendment principles that this Court established in Apprendi v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:36 am
Here, however, he's himself presiding over a Conversant v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:07 pm
The court recognized the principles of two landmark United States Supreme Court cases to explain the relationship between the courts and the residents of their states. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
And that decision's from no schlub of a court: it's from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:28 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division concurred with the Supreme Court’s ruling noting that “The giving of false statements in the course of an official investigation has been upheld as a ground for dismissal from municipal employment," citing Duncan v Kelly, 43 AD3d 297, affirmed 9 NY3d 1024.As the United States Supreme Court held in Bryson v. [read post]
