Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 9221 - 9240 of 10,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:13 am
United States in 2006, greatly reduced the scope of the CWA, undermining decades of clean water protections. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1382.)'" blank">U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
"   Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
"   Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:14 am by Michael J. Brown
The case to be filed will then read: "The State of Texas v. $2,750,000.00 in United States Currency. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
"Simply put, these structural dynamics will tend to recreate the difficulties seen in the context of nationwide class action litigation within the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:20 am
On March 20, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey decided the case of Wade v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Government Has Joined Two San Francisco Federal Court Whistle-Blower Suits Against J&J Subsidiary, United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:56 pm by Michelle C. Laubin
  Among other provisions, this bill would finally bring Connecticut in line with other states and with the 2005 United States Supreme Court decision in Schaffer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]