Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 13,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 7:58 am
Redrafting of Article 10 which relates to processing that does not allow identification. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:58 am
As to the plaintiff's other claims, the court found that the use of the name "The Law Offices of Cohen & Slamowitz" in the April 1 letter, in addition to the name Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP, the name under which it is licensed to do business, does not state a claim for relief under § 1692e(14) (which prohibits a debt collector from using any name other than its "true name"). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:58 am
As to the plaintiff's other claims, the court found that the use of the name "The Law Offices of Cohen & Slamowitz" in the April 1 letter, in addition to the name Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP, the name under which it is licensed to do business, does not state a claim for relief under § 1692e(14) (which prohibits a debt collector from using any name other than its "true name"). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
The current position in interpreting design claims is based on the decision in GlaxoSmithkline Consumer Healthcare GmbH v Anchor Health & Beauty care Private Limited, PTC 2004 (29) 72. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
” (G 2/07 [page 70, lines 10 to 12]). [26] The process of claim 1 does not comprise a step of breeding an animal and none of its steps involves any crossing. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
§24-2-1; Adams v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Slip op. at 29. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
§ 29-26-121. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am
http://t.co/8jPiJJ1thttp://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2238602074140303372012-07-13 15:53:02 HarvardLaw74: In hindsight, venture capital, did Greylock and Andreessen really fund Digg ($45 mil.) http://t.co/enWrNYYa, only value click patent…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2238072556430458892012-07-13 15:43:59 HarvardLaw74: @bfrazjd Pirates storming in cyberlockers lesbian Harvard indie films a big hit on the #copyright high seas… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:26 am
On October 29, 2007, the parties returned to the compensation court for a further proceeding relating to the disputed bills. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
District Y is a 1937 Act agency and does not participate in PERS. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
A contract cannot take away this overtime pay entitlement.[6] Falconbridge does, however, reference the collective agreement when determining what a “work week” actually is, since ESA does not clearly command this aspect of the contract. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:24 am
Prez prays court will protect him and it does! [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
” NEW SCENARIOS If the high court does not take the Nosal case, legal experts say, little is likely to get settled in the near future over how and when the law can be applied. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:23 am
June 29, 2012). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
Indeed, former 29 C.F.R. 541.205(c)(1) makes this very point in noting that secretarial work does not meet the importance (quantitative) element of the exemption. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
” Whether through exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or directly, investors currently hold 75% of the over 1 million bonds that are outstanding. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:07 pm
Pending further guidance in this area, when a platform holds more than 25 investment alternatives, the Department, as a matter of enforcement policy, will not require that all of the investment alternatives be treated, for purposes of this regulation, as designated investment alternatives if the plan administrator— (1) makes the required disclosures for at least three of the investment alternatives on the platform that collectively meet the “broad range” requirements in… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:16 pm
N.J.S.A. 2A:31-1 to -6 [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:16 pm
N.J.S.A. 2A:31-1 to -6 [read post]
