Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 9221 - 9240 of 57,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 1:19 am
-China Economic Relations"11/27/2007 Renewable Fuels Standard for 2008 From the Environmental Protection Agency (PDF 55 KB)Standard as Submitted for Publication in the Federal Register by the EPA © Copyright GalleryWatch.com, Inc. (1999 - 2007), provided under license.NO CLAIM TO ORIGINAL U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:09 pm
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.The federal district court in Washington, D.C. has denied a request from the public interest group Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) for an order compelling the Federal Trade Commission to enforce an October 2011 consent order that the agency signed with Google, Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:49 am by Matt Osenga
The Federal Circuit affirmed the invalidity of the claims at issue in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:04 pm by News Desk
A federal court has enjoined a California company to stop manufacturing and distributing adulterated food products that violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:54 pm by Scott McKeown
Rehearing Cites Lack of Countervailing Public Policy Against PTAB Review Last month the Federal Circuit decided Dodocase VR, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:50 am by Mark Tabakman
Inc. and was filed in the federal district court in the Western District of New York. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:06 pm by Dennis Crouch
In a four-page Federal Register notice of proposed rulemaking of proposed rulemaking, the US Patent Office has indicated its intent to revise its duty-to-disclose standards based upon the recent Federal Circuit en banc decision in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:25 am by Sean Wajert
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 914 N.E.2d 891, 901 (Mass. 2009). [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 12:28 pm
On April 18, 2007, the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, in Coral Construction, Inc. v. [read post]