Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 14,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 6:51 am
However, the Court also found that an employee’s right to bring a representative action under Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) is nonwaivable. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:20 am
Worgan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Lewis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Attorney General (Mass. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:48 pm
The plaintiff in Iskanian also asserted a representative action under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
Garner through Scott v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
Greater protection for life insurance proceeds payable to trusts: In 2012 I wrote here about the Morey v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:55 am
The Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Halliburton v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm
Watch your step – Columbus lawyer Sara Hutchins Jodka of Porter Wright on their Employer Law Report New Materials Look to Change What Our Cars are Made Of – Chicago attorney Jason Britt of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Dashboard Insights Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 6/23/14: Air Passenger Fees; Electric Generating Carbon Emissions; SCOTUS Zenith – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor The SEC… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:54 pm
But the California Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal on the issue of California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) claims and representative action waivers. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm
The plaintiff in Iskanian not only pursued a class action to prosecute allegations of Labor Code violations, but also asserted a representative action under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:02 pm
However, the Court also found that an employee’s right to bring a representative action under Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) is nonwaivable. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:53 pm
In Loughrin v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am
Citizens for a Green San Mateo v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:23 am
Reversing in part a decision from the Eleventh Circuit, which relied extensively on Garcetti v Ceballos, the Court found that the appeals court read Garcetti far too broadly in holding that an employee did not speak as a citizen simply because, when he testified at the trial of a terminated former employee, he had learned of the subject matter of the testimony in the course of his employment. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:25 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:21 am
Background As I discussed in a recent post (here), in a May 8, 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:21 am
Team A v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 8:03 am
United States v. [read post]
