Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 155,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
In that same vein, following is a discussion of a (less recent) decision from the United States Supreme Court, Elgin v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:54 pm
Meanwhile the courts and tribunals of regional and specialized treaty regimes have constructed semi-autonomous domains of inter-locking principles, transcending jurisdictional boundaries and deeply altering the nature and scope of international law, and the decision-making of powerful domestic apex courts (Part V). [read post]
25 Dec 2024, 7:56 am
Town of Montezuma v Smith, 2024 2024 WL 5180663 (4th Dept 12/20/2024) [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:01 am
United States, and in his dissent in Chew Heong v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:26 am
Belvedere v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:20 am
The State’s claim that out-of-state transfers provide a less restrictive alternative to a population limit must [...] [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:11 am
Sentencing ACCA A federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:43 pm
See State v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45) he should have omitted the word… [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
Over on the Election Law Blog, Derek Muller has a post examining Trump's merits brief in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:16 am
" (Paragraph 42)and:"The rule in Hildebrand as we have stated it in paragraph [42] above was and remains good law. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 11:27 am
In my last post on Maryland v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:04 am
Law Lessons from STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am
Fisher is Solicitor General of the state of Indiana, which co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
Reddick v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society and… [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
