Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 9261 - 9280 of 19,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am by Ben Cheng
Arizona applies: (1) unless the officer objectively should have known that his question was likely to elicit an incriminating response, as some courts have held; (2) unless the officer’s intent was to elicit an incriminating response, as other courts have held; or (3) to all questions that serve a legitimate administrative function, regardless of whether the officer should have known that the questions would likely elicit an incriminating response, as still other… [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
But court says, "Whoa, I don't think they can waive that sufficiently for you to do your job. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
Likewise, the Supreme Court held, in Caperton v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
”  Shapiro suspects the Supreme Court may indeed uphold the “show me your papers” portion of the Arizona Immigration Law (other provisions clearly will fall), but will still leave open the issue of discriminatory application. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 7:23 pm by John Day
After Harper, the Court reaffirmed its reasoning in Banks v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm by William A. Ruskin
  In discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Kurns v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm by Eric Goldman
 The authors of this email still don’t understand, or have decided to ignore, the Moderator’s Dilemma. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
Farr — opened his side of the argument by urging the Court to leave the Nevada v. [read post]