Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit"
Results 9281 - 9300
of 10,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
Private Companies The second element of the extraordinary phenomenon that I want to deal with here is the use of private companies by the United States in the course of its rendition programme. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:21 pm
United States, 340 U.S. 367, 373 (1951). [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
United States, 16-142. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
So, for instance, the Ninth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:40 pm
It is almost a certainty that BSEE will appeal this decision to the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an administrative stay to consider the arguments on appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Similarly, Social Security benefits are limited to those “lawfully present in the United States as determined by the [Secretary],” 8 U.S.C. 1611(b)(2) (emphasis added), and the government has interpreted that statute to authorize the DHS Secretary to extend eligibility to individuals who are granted deferred action (while stressing that it does not regard such individuals as “lawfully present” in any broader sense). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:45 am
Therefore, there was no basis for compelling the identification of the web site’s operator.The standards for identifying anonymous Internet speakers was also addressed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in In re Anonymous Online Speakers, where the court declined to issue a mandamus overturning the discovery ruling in Quixtar Management v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 9:33 am
Similarly, under the United States Department of Labor Wage and Hour regulations at 29 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:37 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Whitehouse.gov’s 3rd party content under CC-BY (Creative Commons) EFF’s site FreeYourPhone.org launches, pushes for new DMCA exemption (Ars Technica) Corporation of Public Broadcasting agrees on internet royalty payments (ContentAgenda) Music piracy not that bad, industry says (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions District Court W D Virginia: Judge decides 17,000 illegal downloads don’t equal 17,000 lost sales:… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Bovrisse will appear at the United Nations in Geneva later this month to appeal for equal rights in the workplace. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:40 am
In December 2008, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that some of the gag provisions in NSLs were unconstitutional — in part because they limited judicial review of the gag orders and forced courts to defer to the government’s assertions about the necessity of a gag order, and in part because they thwarted the ability of recipients to challenge the gag order. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:17 am
McManusDecision Date: December 6, 2019 The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a ruling by the Maryland District Court declaring unconstitutional the content-based regulation on speech under Maryland’s Online Electioneering Transparency and Accountability Act, 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am
Instead, Smith leveled four charges that focused more narrowly on Trump’s multi-state false electors scheme and the pressure campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to count those fraudulent electoral votes: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstructing an official proceeding, and violating a Reconstruction-era civil rights law, drafted originally to protect formerly enslaved people through criminal sanction. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
In May, the Eighth Circuit gave an important boost to policyholders in State Bank of Bellingham v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in In re: Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 12:50 am
The court was concerned only with the question whether or not the policyholder had satisfied the procedural requirements stated in the policy. [read post]
