Search for: "Ex Parte May"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 12,870
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
This is the most interesting part of the judgment, in which the court made reference to a number of official reports on e.g. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
(emphasis added) While, ex parte patent reexamination has always been available for any enforceable patent these proceedings are typically disfavored over inter partes proceedings as being too one-sided, and historically biased in favor of patent holders. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm
Uncoupling the cases may diffuse the rhetoric and pave the way for a more nuanced understanding of law and policy. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:25 pm
(But, remember, ex parte reexamination is essentially unused now.)But in the weekly update of re-exams from InvnTree , ex parte outnumbered inter partes 2 to 1!! [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:06 pm
From his website, Unprison:Some of you may be reading this article subsequent to a Google search, and I strategically tagged it with metadata so you will be directed here. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
More probably, Walton suggested, the Taliban tolerated Suleiman’s two visits because Suleiman was actually “part of” the Taliban. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
(Ex parte Kislevitz, BPAI 2011.) [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:28 am
(Ex parte Gilmour, BPAI 2011.) [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
However, failure to disclose the best mode will no longer be a basis upon which an issued patent claim may be canceled or held invalid or otherwi [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
Temporary peace orders (a) Authorized; forms of relief available. --(1) If after a hearing on a petition, whether ex parte or otherwise, a judge finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has committed, and is l [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:56 pm
The plaintiff may do so either by showing that the defendant’s explanation is only a pretext for discrimination. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:37 am
This may be. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:00 am
Sex in an integral part of a healthy marriage. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
The answer may surprise you - "No. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 (1954), in which the Court held that ex parte communications with jurors are “presumptively prejudicial. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:59 pm
If you are involved in a so-called “amicable divorce”, are there identifiable signs that signal your divorce may be meandering to the low-road? [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:24 pm
We fired the company's CEO and, as a parting shot, she said in an interview that we were "doofuses" and that we "f---ed [her] over. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
We’re going to use those later — in part by going to PACER to search for bankruptcy court records. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:43 am
"On May 5, 1997, Mr. [read post]
