Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 173,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 11:27 am
As a general matter, federal courts apply state law to 'substantive' questions when state law created the underlying cause of action. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:11 pm
Truly v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 11:50 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
Plaso v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:55 am
June Medical Services LLC in this appellate incarnation has approved a law with no beneficial effect (unless one thinks that blocking lawful abortion is good for health, a motive for state action that Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:20 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law §§1.01–1.07 (2012 and Supp. 2015); V. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm
In Broussard v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:19 am
Concepcion, which considers whether the invalidation of class action waivers on state-law unconscionability grounds (i.e. the Discover Bank rule) is preempted under the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
18 May 2015, 12:44 pm
Mae Kuykendall, Michigan State University College of Law, is publishing Evaluating the Sociology of First Amendment Silence in volume 42 of the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly (2015). [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:01 am
Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 99.1 (November 2010) Articles The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State Farm Mutual Automobile… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
In letters dated October 27, 2009 (State AG Letter re HR 3190; State AG Letter re S 148), 41 state attorneys general wrote to Congress asking them to overrule Leegin Creative Leather Product, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:51 pm
All States Plastic Mfg. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 11:47 am
Lamott (Violence Against Women Act) United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
United States, 2020 WL 398625 (D.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 3:05 am
The case law is rife with General Municipal Law mistakes, as well as Court of Claims Act errors. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Thus, the authority to speak need not always appear in written law. [read post]
