Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 60,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
United States and O’Neal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:37 am
I suppose she means state-run universities, in which case we will just note that states are subsidizing less and less these days, and move on. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:59 pm
§ 4A1.1(d)):"Add 2 points if the defendant committed the instant offense while under any criminal justice sentence, including probation, parole, supervised release, imprisonment, work release, or escape status." [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:18 pm
Obama's policy does a better job of working most of the angles of the problem, and makes proposals for addressing them. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
In state court, in the state of Washington (Spokane). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:27 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
While for most Americans, Loving v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 5:50 am
Second, state courts are assumed to have developed a proficiency in these matters, to have procedures tailored to them, and to work closely with and even employ specialized staff not found in federal courts. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
Czepiga Earlier this month (the decision will be officially released on June 17th) the Connecticut Supreme Court decided the case of Palomba-Bourke v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:13 am
In contrast, in this procedural posture (summary judgment by a review website), the defense worked perfectly. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
In WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 9:05 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:14 pm
One of the other Supreme Court clerks with whom she served, Deborah Jones Merritt, reflected in the Arizona State Law Journal that Justice McGregor worked on the influential case Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 4:00 am
The action was also brought against two employees that worked in sales at these stores. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:58 am
InfoUSA; Nasser v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
The government denied the subsequent change order request (submitted by Syska), stating that the pond work was in the scope of the original contract and Syska withheld money owed for other aspects of the work to make up the difference for the previously billed pond work. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:16 pm
In a decision released by the Connecticut Supreme Court on November 16, 2010, Board of Education of Region 16 v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
An Indiana federal court decision, Harper v. [read post]
