Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 9321 - 9340 of 15,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Eric Alexander
Warner-Lambert, 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), was wrong and Lofton v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm by Eric Alexander
Warner-Lambert, 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), was wrong and Lofton v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In that regard, the Appellate Division noted that the money damages that the retiree sought were calculated by using as a base figure what she would have received as her pension benefit had she initially selected the "Maximum" option. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 7:27 pm
The Daily Record wrote up an article, 4th Circuit Backs Consumers Whose Cars Are Totaled which outlined a new decision in Decohen v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm
I assume that counsel will be able to agree on the precise figure. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
A mark which is excessively simply and constituted by a basic geometrical figure, is not, in itself, capable of conveying a message which consumers will be able to remember, with the result that they will not regard it as a trade mark (unless it has acquired distinctive character through use). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:38 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The trial court disagreed with both parties and awarded delay damages on the reduced figure of $233,306.98. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:21 am by Venkat
For starters, the purchase and sale agreement is worth taking a look at: Purchase and Sale Agreement re DYAC Website (see p. 36 of the .pdf for a breakdown of the traffic figures). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 3:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Yet the Federal Circuit paid no heed when it issued ruled in CLS Bank v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
These are complex cases that even industry experts with a strong business and technical background have a hard time figuring out. [read post]