Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 18,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
Among other issues turned aside by the Court Tuesday: a test of whether states have any authority to bar cellphone companies from listing taxes and fees as separate items on monthly bills to customers; the Eleventh Circuit found that the states do retain some of that power (Sprint Nextel v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:49 pm
In Elcan v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
‘The term child safety zone shall mean one thousand feet of the real property comprising a public or private, elementary, middle or high school, child care facility, park playground, public or private youth center or public swimming pool. [read post]
18 Mar 2006, 1:48 am
In Evans v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:27 pm
V. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:04 am
This term, in Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:24 am
Related: Bradley v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:35 am
United States, 559 U. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:17 pm
Hamilton v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:15 pm
Carter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Instead, the lawsuit builds on a 2003 United States Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 1:03 pm
She appealed and the Appellate Court reversed the decision, stating that the letter, based upon Smith v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:41 pm
Boehm, J., dissents with opinion.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 5:23 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257 [2008]). [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:42 pm
The court noted the Restatement of Torts:...which states that "[o]ne who tortiously causes harm to an unborn child is subject to liability to the child for the harm if the child is born alive. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am
HW [2001] 3 I.R. 622, where the threshold for state intervention was stated by Murray J to require an “immediate and fundamental threat to the capacity of the child to continue to function as a human person, physically morally or socially, deriving from an exceptional dereliction of duty on the part of parents to justify such an intervention. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:59 am
We held in United States v. [read post]
