Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 173,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 8:25 pm
The Court held:Churches, like all other institutions, must adhere to state and federal employment laws. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 3:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
The most recent Maryland Court of Appeals case discussing whether Maritime Law applies can be found in Matthews v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am
The case has important implications for law students interested in First Amendment, legal and judicial ethics, political law, and the governance of the judiciaries throughout the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Television Series, Preemption of Implied In Fact Contract To Sell an Idea, Pitching an Idea, Choice of Law, Conflicts of Law Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:51 am
Jones Law Firm, P.C. v J Synergy Green, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 31127(U) April 2, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653730/2023 Judge: Lyle E. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm
(Custody Order; Abuse of Discretion or Misapplication of the Law) Fort Peck Tribes v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:42 pm
Dean Salkin joined with nine other law professors in an amicus brief to the NY Appellate Division, 3rd Dept. in Norse Energy v Town of Dryden. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:42 pm
Dean Salkin joined with nine other law professors in an amicus brief to the NY Appellate Division, 3rd Dept. in Norse Energy v Town of Dryden. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
S.954: A bill to provide grants to State, local, territorial, and Tribal law enforcement agencies to purchase chemical screening devices and train personnel to use chemical screening devices in order to enhance law enforcement efficiency and protect law enforcement officers. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Concepcion] essentially preempts all California law relating to unconscionability,” the Mission Viejo panel sharply rejected this absolutist interpretation of Concepcion, stating: “We disagree, as the case [Concepcion] simply does not go that far. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:57 am
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlIn re M.K.T. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In EMW Women's Surgical Center v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:47 am
Erfe (RLUIPA) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlCora G. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:17 am
Either the law upon which a panelist rested his or her decision or his or her understanding of the law was grounded on a false premise. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:46 pm
The latest issue of the Human Rights Law Review (Vol. 18, no. 2, June 2018) is out. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
In NeuroRepair v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am
The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am
The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
