Search for: "Driver v. State"
Results 9341 - 9360
of 10,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 11:03 am
CPU Litigation, Bledsoe et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
The transcript was produced as a result of testimony taken in the cases of State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
Another example of this was in the 1991 case of State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
In that case, the ECJ was asked to consider the validity of the Standard Contractual Clauses Decision and the Privacy Shield—the two mechanisms under which the data of European citizens were being transferred to the United States under Part V of the GDPR. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm
The claimants brought their claim under Quebec’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, but the Supreme Court stated that its analysis also applied under the Canadian Charter (Amselem, para. 37). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:15 am
” The IISD paper takes the same approach, arguing that investor-state arbitration raises public interest concerns because (1) these involve states as parties; (2) they often involve disputes in public service sectors (such as the privatized gas utilities involved in several of the most prominent Argentina cases); (3) they often challenge regulatory measures justified on the basis of protecting the public; (4) such arbitrations affect taxpayers’ interests given their… [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm
And in en banc news, the Fifth Circuit will not reconsider its ruling that tanker-truck drivers transporting crude oil entirely within the state of Texas are engaged in "interstate or foreign commerce" as defined by the Motor Carrier Act of 1935. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Cooley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:40 pm
In Gintert v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:12 pm
In today’s case (SH v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm
For instance, he might set a criminal free for a reason which has nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence or the justice of the case.Orin Kerr at VC has this post on United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:18 am
In another case, Plumhoff v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 8:15 am
Hollis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
However, it was decided by the United States Supreme Court in Enmund v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that by agreeing to hear the New York gun case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am
In Williams v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
However, it was decided by the United States Supreme Court in Enmund v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:06 am
Similarly, a few days ago, a district court in Washington, DC, in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
