Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 9341 - 9360
of 19,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2008, 11:31 pm
The Court has agreed to decide 15 business-related cases thus far, noted Mark I. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:38 am
Lines we have, or marks at least. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:39 pm
The child then indicated the red marks were caused by his stepfather. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
Susan V. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm
Code § 39A “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft” in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 2:55 pm
The new decision, in the case of Cooper v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:48 am
Interlink Products Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[No]Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on these Two Design Marks for Keyboards and Computer Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are LEN and LENS Confusable for Clothing Store Services? [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
Proposed marks that are not used for "goods in trade" cannot be registered on the Principal or the Supplemental Register. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
Nordstrom, Inc. v. 7525419 Canada Inc., No. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:40 am
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:02 am
A.Hak Industrial Services BV v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Legal scholar Garrett Epps and Slate commentator Mark Joseph Stern see Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
Old Railroad Bed, LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
But one recent ruling out of that court seems to be getting little notice: Utah v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
At Slate, Judith Schaeffer marks the forty-eighth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:17 am
In Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:45 am
People of the State of New York U.S. [read post]
