Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 9361 - 9380 of 15,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
One way to figure out if a case is a test case is to look at the lawyers. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:00 pm by Colin Murray
Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am by SHG
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If what is meant is (as understood by the ED in the present case) that there is no modification whatsoever of any other feature of the embodiment, than the condition is trivial and almost never fulfilled (for instance, when a different water level sensor is used […]).[2.9] Therefore, contrary to the opinion of the ED (and of the [applicant]), the Board considers the “three point or essentiality test” (cf. the Guidelines H-V 3.1 and H-V 3.2.1 (June 2012 edition))… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]