Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 921 - 940
of 10,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
SEC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:00 am
Additionally, despite the fact that the safe harbor under Rule 506(b) does not allow the offer and sale of securities by any form of general solicitation, general solicitation is permitted under Regulation Crowdfunding and Rule 506(c) of Regulation D. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:06 am
Je salue et encourage tous à vous joindre aux nombreuses célébrations et observances de cet important événement. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Unfair competition crept in late, in 44(h), b/c Congress believed we’d signed a treaty requiring it. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:14 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:53 pm
Croyez moi, c’est apprécié. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 10:19 am
§1446(c), effective in 2012. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
There, a Federal Circuit panel (Newman, Dyk, and Reyna) indicated that the Director’s decision to institute and join parties under § 315(c) is not subject to review because, like § 315(b), it seemed “closely related to [the Director’s] decision whether to institute inter partes review and is therefore rendered nonappealable by § 314(d). [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:32 pm
§ 512(c)(3)(B)(ii). [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm
This is what occurred in Sharma v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 11:46 pm
Mindeközben pedig a email címen keresztül emailben is definitely beszélhetsz a Verde Casino csapatával. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
La véritable intention des Anglais, lorsqu’ils entreprirent le Grand Dérangement, n’était pas, contrairement à l’intention qui anime les responsables de crimes de génocide, la destruction physique ou biologique d’un groupe. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:51 pm
Cir. 2016),rev’d on other ground, 137 S. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:54 am
Contracts — Breach — Definition of “wage” Dr. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
§ 141(c)) (alterations in original). [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:16 am
It seems to me that (a) the rule clearly on its face allowed exceptions, (b) the judicial council resolution was of no force and effect, (c) the judicial conference resolution was of no legal force and effect, (d) there is no such thing as "advisory mandamus", and (e) the First Amendment certainly was implicated. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Nielsen c. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:11 pm
LEXIS 83119 (D. [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
” Katsas uses the example that in, “A, B, C, or otherwise D,” “[i]f the boundaries of ‘D’ were readily ascertainable without clarification, a speaker would simply say ‘D,’ rather than using a longer and clunkier formulation with examples and a residual ‘otherwise’ clause. [read post]
