Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 921 - 940 of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 5:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants’ approach needlessly deprives the court of useful procedural tools associated with summary judgment motions, including the requirement that parties supply statements of material facts (see Rules of Commercial Div of Sup Ct [22 NYCRR] § 202.70 [g] [rule 19-a]; see also 22 NYCRR 202.8-g). [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Québec (Procureure générale) c. [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
More importantly, however, the principle relied on in decision R 21/11, namely that the replacement of members of the BoA should not be ordered without good reason, is not merely a matter of procedural economy. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by David Smith
For Mr G it was argued that proceedings against him should be stayed due to the DRO. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by David Smith
For Mr G it was argued that proceedings against him should be stayed due to the DRO. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:09 pm
Turning to that portion of the defendant's motion which seeks dismissal in the interests of justice, CPL 170.40 (1) provides, in relevant part, that the criminal charge against the defendant "may be dismissed in the interest of justice when, even though there may be no basis for dismissal as a matter of law such dismissal is required as a matter of judicial discretion by the existence of some compelling factor, consideration or circumstance clearly demonstrating that conviction or… [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 1:35 pm by Corynne McSherry
A proper counter-notice must contain the following information: The user's name, address, phone number, and physical or electronic signature [512(g)(3)(A)] Identification of the material and its location before removal [512(g)(3)(B)] A statement under penalty of perjury that the material was removed by mistake or misidentification [512(g)(3)(C)] Consent to local federal court jurisdiction, or if overseas, to an appropriate judicial body.… [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court said: “[The journalists] wrote press articles that were published in the Göteborgs-Posten newspaper and on the Göteborgs-Posten website. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
They did this through the infamous Omnibus Bills, especially C-38[1] in 2012. [read post]