Search for: "DOES 1-116" Results 921 - 940 of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
(see http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/116. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 12:19 pm by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
In re Standard Jury Instructions — Contract and Business Cases, 116 So. 3d 284, 286-90 (Fla. 2013). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In short, Parliament’s jurisdiction over criminal law cannot be exercised when the object of the legislation does not truly fit within the framework of criminal law. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Brian Finucane
In the wake of Chadha Congress enacted expedited procedures for joint resolutions requiring the removal of U.S. armed forces from hostilities, which does require presentment to the president.) [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
  [1]  This month we will continue our study of the classical beginnings of admiralty and maritime law by examining mighty Rome - what its legal system was like, how Rome's laws evolved and amplified the admiralty that came before them, and most importantly how Rome's influence on maritime legal matters influenced a wide array of modern doctrines from maritime tort and contract liability to general average. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:26 am by Alex Phipps
District Attorney holds exclusive discretionary power to reinstate criminal charges dismissed with leave; trial court does not have authority to compel district attorney to reinstate charges dismissed with leave. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
By Sarah McKibbin, University of Southern Queensland Epic Games, the developer of the highly popular and lucrative online video game Fortnite, recently won an appeal against tech juggernaut, Apple, in Australia’s Federal Court.[1] Fortnite is played by over three million Apple iOS users in Australia.[2] In April 2021, Justice Perram awarded Apple a temporary three-month stay of proceedings on the basis of an exclusive foreign choice of court agreement in favour of the courts of the… [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 12:06 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Trees The Maryland Attorney General recently issued an opinion concluding that the placement of a protective easement on an already existing forest, as opposed to intentionally created or restored forest, does not qualify for forest mitigation banking. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm by NL
The private law decision may be unfettered, but that does not exclude public law controls - for example terminating a local authority tenancy at the time before they had statutory security of tenure, Cannock Chase DC v Kelly [1978] 1 WLR 1. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm by NL
The private law decision may be unfettered, but that does not exclude public law controls - for example terminating a local authority tenancy at the time before they had statutory security of tenure, Cannock Chase DC v Kelly [1978] 1 WLR 1. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
While the 2021 LRDP does not set limits on the campus’s future population, it does “establish a maximum amount of new growth that the university may not substantially exceed without amending the plan and conducting additional environmental review. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
A summary of existing FTTs can be found in Table 1. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of West Hollywood (2008) 45 Cal.4th 116 regarding “which project-related activities may occur prior to environmental review and project approval. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
Blogpost 27/2024 Transparency and environmental policy are two key issues in the upcoming European Parliament elections. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm by Matthew Ackerman
Unlike Michigan, Minnesota does not cap attorney fees at one-third of the amount by which the ultimate award exceeds the good faith offer. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This analysis discusses (1) the retirement funding problems; (2) federal efforts to address the retirement funding problems; (3) why the current federal efforts will not take the spotlight off fiduciaries anytime soon; (4) what being in the spotlight will mean for fiduciaries; and (5) reducing fiduciaries’ risk profiles. [read post]