Search for: "Fee v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 6,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the state’s long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:37 pm by T. Doyle
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Knox v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 4:49 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Trump, was ubiquitous in the national news throughout much of Trump’s administration as President of the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 11:15 am by Native American Rights Fund
Jewell (Attorney Fees, Trust Fund) United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlSisseton Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:35 am by Viking
Another collateral consequences note, from United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A 2005, Waco Court of Appeals case styled, United States Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:15 am by Roy Ginsburg
Background The IRCA makes it “unlawful for a person or other entity . . . to hire, or to recruit or to refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an alien knowing the alien is an unauthorized alien. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm by Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC
Additionally, in a Subchapter V case, the business is not required to pay quarterly fees to the United States Trustee. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am by Mack Sperling
" That seems pretty clear, since Section 2412 says that it does not "alter[ ], modif[y], repeal[ ], invalidate[ ], or supersede[ ] any other provision of Federal law which authorizes an award of such fees and other expenses to any party other than the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:46 am
Compliance and E-Discovery: Two Inseparable Risk Management Functions Editor: The United States District Court for the Southern District of California's decision in Qualcomm v. [read post]