Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 68,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 4:19 am
The invention for which the patent was granted was a “Method and apparatus for controlling [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:53 am
The post More orders, but no new grants appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:49 am
The only criminal case of the three is Bucklew v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:05 am
" They sued State Farm for breach of contract and bad faith.The district court granted judgment as a matter of law for the plaintiffs on liability and submitted the case to a jury to award damages. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 10:38 am
The California Supreme Court granted review on August 19, 2015, stating the issues as follows: (1) Is the plaintiff in a representative action under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am
On December 11, 2019, the California Supreme Court by a 7-0 vote granted the petition for review of Butte and Plumas Counties and the Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in County of Butte v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Yesterday’s second grant, in Lozman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:33 pm
State was granted transfer today, Sept. 23rd. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:56 am
But in its order granting cert, the Court stated that Texas and the foster families would file first, or be “top side” in the briefing schedule. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:54 pm
The State of Hawaii filed its merits brief in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 2:53 am
I had petition for review granted by the KSC in State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:41 am
Regina (SG ( Iraq)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Regina (OR ( Iraq)) Same: [2012] EWCA Civ 940; [2012] WLR (D) 207 “A claimant affected by, but not party to, a country guidance determination which was under appeal to the Court of Appeal was not entitled to an automatic stay of removal pending the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 4:10 am
Supreme Court in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:04 am
22 Apr 2007, 9:29 am
The State moved to dismiss, and the trial court granted the motion.On appeal, the Court of Appeals noted that there was "no factual allegation as to the basis for the knowledge attributed to the State or that related why the State should have been aware of any deviant tendencies that [the perpetrator] may have had, or even that he, in fact, had such tendencies prior to the alleged incidents that occurred with the [plaintiff]. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:33 am
The motions to exclude were denied in part and granted in part Facts: This antitrust case (Gumwood HP Shopping Partners LP v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:57 am
In the case of Fuller v. [read post]
